Comparison of an analog direct detection and a micropulse aerosol lidar at 1.5-μm wavelength for wind field observations—with first results over the ocean

Shane D. Mayor; Pierre Dérian; Christopher F. Mauzey; Scott M. Spuler; Patrick L. Ponsardin; Jeff D. Pruitt; Darrell Ramsey; Noah S. Higdon

doi:10.1117/1.JRS.10.016031

29 March 2016 Comparison of an analog direct detection and a micropulse aerosol lidar at 1.5-μm wavelength for wind field observations—with first results over the ocean

Shane D. Mayor, Pierre Dérian, Christopher F. Mauzey, Scott M. Spuler, Patrick L. Ponsardin, Jeff D. Pruitt, Darrell Ramsey, Noah S. Higdon

Author Affiliations +

Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, Vol. 10, Issue 1, 016031 (March 2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.10.016031

Abstract

The performance of two direct-detection atmospheric lidar systems with very different methods of generating and detecting laser radiation is compared as the result of a field experiment held in March 2015, in Chico, California. During the noncontinuous, 11-day test period, in which the systems operated side by side, the micropulse lidar was operated at its maximum pulse repetition frequency (15 kHz) and integrated elastic backscatter over the interpulse period of the analog direct-detection lidar (0.1 s). Operation at the high pulse repetition frequency resulted in second-trip echoes that contaminated portions of the data. The performance of the micropulse lidar varied with background brightness—as expected with a photon-counting receiver—yet showed equal or larger backscatter intensity signal-to-noise ratio throughout the experiment. Examples of wind fields and time series of wind vectors from both systems during the Chico experiment are presented. In addition, scans over the ocean that were collected by the micropulse lidar during a subsequent deployment on the northern California coast are presented. We conclude by reviewing the advantages and disadvantages of each system and make some suggestions to improve the design and performance of future systems.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.

Citation Download Citation

Shane D. Mayor, Pierre Dérian, Christopher F. Mauzey, Scott M. Spuler, Patrick L. Ponsardin, Jeff D. Pruitt, Darrell Ramsey, and Noah S. Higdon "Comparison of an analog direct detection and a micropulse aerosol lidar at 1.5-μm wavelength for wind field observations—with first results over the ocean," Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 10(1), 016031 (29 March 2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.10.016031

Published: 29 March 2016

Access the abstract

JOURNAL ARTICLE
16 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY