Performance evaluation of random forest and support vector regressions in natural hazard change detection

Vahid Eisavi; Saeid Homayouni

doi:10.1117/1.JRS.10.046030

30 December 2016 Performance evaluation of random forest and support vector regressions in natural hazard change detection

Vahid Eisavi, Saeid Homayouni

Author Affiliations +

Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, Vol. 10, Issue 4, 046030 (December 2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.10.046030

Abstract

Information on land use and land cover changes is considered as a foremost requirement for monitoring environmental change. Developing change detection methodology in the remote sensing community is an active research topic. However, to the best of our knowledge, no research has been conducted so far on the application of random forest regression (RFR) and support vector regression (SVR) for natural hazard change detection from high-resolution optical remote sensing observations. Hence, the objective of this study is to examine the use of RFR and SVR to discriminate between changed and unchanged areas after a tsunami. For this study, RFR and SVR were applied to two different pilot coastlines in Indonesia and Japan. Two different remotely sensed data sets acquired by Quickbird and Ikonos sensors were used for efficient evaluation of the proposed methodology. The results demonstrated better performance of SVM compared to random forest (RF) with an overall accuracy higher by 3% to 4% and kappa coefficient by 0.05 to 0.07. Using McNemar’s test, statistically significant differences (Z≥1.96), at the 5% significance level, between the confusion matrices of the RF classifier and the support vector classifier were observed in both study areas. The high accuracy of change detection obtained in this study confirms that these methods have the potential to be used for detecting changes due to natural hazards.

Citation Download Citation

Vahid Eisavi and Saeid Homayouni "Performance evaluation of random forest and support vector regressions in natural hazard change detection," Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 10(4), 046030 (30 December 2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.10.046030

Received: 3 August 2016; Accepted: 6 December 2016; Published: 30 December 2016

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available