Paper
13 June 1989 Possible Implications Of Vascular Damage For Tumor Cell Inactivation In Vivo: Comparison Of Different Photosensitizers
Barbara W. Henderson, Gwendolyn Farrell
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 1065, Photodynamic Therapy: Mechanisms; (1989) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.977998
Event: OE/LASE '89, 1989, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Abstract
Various different photosensitizers were compared to Photofrin® II with respect to their potential for causing direct tumor cell inactivation and/or vascular damage. GaCl-phthalocyanine of mixed sulfonation, while being 10 x more efficient than Photofrin® II in tumor cell inactivation, caused equal vascular photosensitization. Monosulfonated AlC1-phthalocyanine, on the other hand, was sparing to the vasculature, while still exhibiting good tumor cell effects. Large differences in vascular photosensitization were also observed with tetra- and monosulfonated tetraphenylporphines.
© (1989) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Barbara W. Henderson and Gwendolyn Farrell "Possible Implications Of Vascular Damage For Tumor Cell Inactivation In Vivo: Comparison Of Different Photosensitizers", Proc. SPIE 1065, Photodynamic Therapy: Mechanisms, (13 June 1989); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.977998
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 19 scholarly publications and 1 patent.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Tumors

Photodynamic therapy

In vivo imaging

In vitro testing

Hypoxia

Skin

Absorbance

Back to Top