Review of camouflage assessment techniques

Alexander Toet; Maarten A. Hogervorst

doi:10.1117/12.2566183

20 September 2020 Review of camouflage assessment techniques

Proceedings Volume 11536, Target and Background Signatures VI; 1153604 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2566183
Event: SPIE Security + Defence, 2020, Online Only

Abstract

In military operations signature reduction techniques such as camouflage nets, low-emissive paints, and camouflage patterns are typically deployed to optimize the survivability of high value assets by minimizing their detectability. Various methods have been developed to assess the effectiveness of these camouflage measures. There are three main approaches to the evaluation of camouflage measures: (1) a subjective approach through observer experiments, (2) an objective computational approach through image analysis, and (3) an objective approach through physical measurements. Although subjective evaluation methods have a direct relation with the operational practice, they are often difficult to implement because of time and budget restrictions, or simply because the associated conditions are not safe for the observers. Objective evaluation methods are typically based on the outcome of psychophysical laboratory experiments using simple artificial stimuli, presented under extremely restricted (impoverished) conditions, and in different experimental paradigms. Objective methods based on signal processing techniques have no obvious counterpart in human vision. So far, no attempts have been made to validate any of these objective metrics against the performance of human observers in realistic military scenarios. As a result, there are currently no standard and internationally accepted methods and procedures to evaluate camouflage equipment and techniques, and to indicate their military effectiveness. In this review paper we present an overview of the various subjective (psychophysical) and objective (computational, image or video based) evaluation methods that are currently available and that have been used to validate camouflage effectiveness. In addition, we will discuss the relative merits of field experiments versus laboratory experiments.

Conference Presentation

Citation Download Citation

Alexander Toet and Maarten A. Hogervorst "Review of camouflage assessment techniques", Proc. SPIE 11536, Target and Background Signatures VI, 1153604 (20 September 2020); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2566183

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available