Selection of attenuated phase shift mask compatible contact hole resists for KrF optical lithography

Zhijian G. Lu; Yuping Cui; Alan C. Thomas; Scott M. Mansfield; Gerhard Kunkel; David Dobuzinsky; Franz X. Zach; Daniel Liu; K. Rex Chen; George M. Jordhamo; Alois Gutmann; Timothy R. Farrell

doi:10.1117/12.350280

11 June 1999 Selection of attenuated phase shift mask compatible contact hole resists for KrF optical lithography

Zhijian G. Lu, Yuping Cui, Alan C. Thomas, Scott M. Mansfield, Gerhard Kunkel, David Dobuzinsky, Franz X. Zach, Daniel Liu, K. Rex Chen, George M. Jordhamo, Alois Gutmann, Timothy R. Farrell

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 3678, Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XVI; (1999) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.350280
Event: Microlithography '99, 1999, Santa Clara, CA, United States

Abstract

Multiple contact hole resist samples from a variety of DUV resist suppliers, including both acetal and ESCAP chemistries are evaluated on an organic anti-reflective under layer (ARC) using an attenuated phase shift mask (APSM). One sample exhibited excellent surface inhibition and superior lithographic performance for patterning contact holes of 0.2 micrometers imaging size. For most of resists, the process windows are limited by unwanted sidelobe printing through focus. The sensitivity of sidelobe printing to focus can be attributed to lens aberrations. For the first time, we prose to use Depth-of-focus (DOF) loss PWL_dof and Exposure latitude (EL) loss PWL_el to characterize resists surface inhibition, as well discovered that DOF loss is a sensitive measure of surface inhibition. Similar lithographic performance is obtained from acetal and ESCAP based materials. The two ESCAP resists EB3 and EA2 have better oxide etch resistance than the acetal resist AC1. The top surface reticulation is observed on ESCAP resist EB3 and EA2 during the oxide etch, but not on the acetal resist AC1. 110 nm underexposed resolutions achieved with the resist EA4 at a mask size of 250 nm. Faster resists generally exhibit better resolution but have smaller process windows when side lobe printing is included as a criterion. Selection of a resist formulation for attenuated phase shift applications has to face a compromise between resolution, photospeed, process window and surface inhibition. Finally, ARC operational modes and optical properties had little effect on sidelobe printing, and optimization of PEB temperature is important in suppressing sidelobe printing.

Citation Download Citation

Zhijian G. Lu, Yuping Cui, Alan C. Thomas, Scott M. Mansfield, Gerhard Kunkel, David Dobuzinsky, Franz X. Zach, Daniel Liu, K. Rex Chen, George M. Jordhamo, Alois Gutmann, and Timothy R. Farrell "Selection of attenuated phase shift mask compatible contact hole resists for KrF optical lithography", Proc. SPIE 3678, Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XVI, (11 June 1999); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.350280

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available