Optical-based navigation systems are widely used in surgical interventions. However, despite their great utility and accuracy, they are expensive and require time and effort to setup for surgeries. Moreover, traditional navigation systems use 2D screens to display instrument positions causing the surgeons to look away from the operative field. Head mounted displays such as the Microsoft HoloLens may provide an attractive alternative for surgical navigation that also permits augmented reality visualization. The HoloLens is equipped with multiple sensors for tracking and scene understanding. Mono and stereo-vision in the HoloLens have been both reported to be used for marker tracking, but no extensive evaluation on accuracy has been done to compare the two approaches. The objective of our work is to investigate the tracking performance of various camera setups in the HoloLens, and to study the effect of the marker size, marker distance from camera, and camera resolution on marker locating accuracy. We also investigate the speed and stability of marker pose for each camera setup. The tracking approaches are evaluated using ArUco markers. Our results show that mono-vision is more accurate in marker locating than stereo-vision when high resolution is used. However, this comes at the expense of higher frame processing time. Alternatively, we propose a combined low-resolution mono-stereo tracking setup that outperforms each tracking approach individually and is comparable to high resolution mono tracking, with a mean translational error of 1.8±0.6mm for 10cm marker size at 50cm distance. We further discuss our findings and their implications for navigation in surgical interventions.
In oral cavity cancer only 15% of operations succeed in removing the whole tumor with the required margin of more than 5 mm of surrounding healthy tissue. This negatively affects prognosis. Clearly the hands and eyes of the surgeon do not suffice.
We use a fiber optic needle probe for high-wavenumber Raman spectroscopic analysis of the freshly resected tissue to determine if the distance between the resection surface and the tumor is sufficient.
A system is under development to inspect the resected tissue in under 15 minutes, while the patient is still in the OR.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.