Mr. Joseph M. DePasquale Profile

Joseph M. DePasquale

IT Specialist at Harvard-Smithsonian Ctr for Astrophysics

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (14)

Proceedings Article | 17 September 2012 Paper

Cross-calibration of the x-ray instruments onboard the Chandra, Suzaku, Swift, and XMM-Newton Observatories using the SNR 1E 0102.2-7219

Adam Foster, Eric Miller, Frank Haberl, Paul Plucinsky, Steve Sembay, Randall Smith, Andrew Beardmore, Joseph DePasquale, Daniel Dewey, A. M. Pollock, Jennifer L. Posson-Brown

Proceedings Volume 8443, 844312 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.926506

KEYWORDS: Charge-coupled devices, Calibration, X-rays, Molybdenum, Roentgenium, Signal to noise ratio, Data modeling, Neon, Sensors, Absorption

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 15 July 2008 Paper

The SMC SNR 1E0102.2-7219 as a calibration standard for x-ray astronomy in the 0.3-2.5 keV bandpass

Randall Smith, Daniel Dewey, Paul Plucinsky, A. Pollock, Frank Haberl, Victoria Grinberg, Olivier Godet, Eric Miller, Joseph DePasquale, Steven Sembay, Andrew Beardmore

Proceedings Volume 7011, 70112E (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.789191

KEYWORDS: Neon, Calibration, Charge-coupled devices, Roentgenium, Iron, Data modeling, Molybdenum, Signal to noise ratio, X-rays, Magnesium

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 12 July 2008 Paper

Changing software philosophy for ACIS operations as Chandra ages

Paul Plucinsky, Nancy Adams-Wolk, Joseph DePasquale

Proceedings Volume 7016, 70161J (2008) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.789450

KEYWORDS: Space operations, X-ray sources, Databases, Solids, Photons, X-rays, Charge-coupled devices, Safety, Space telescopes, Telescopes

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 18 September 2007 Paper

Managing radiation degradation of CCDs on the Chandra X-ray Observatory III

Jon Chappell, Catherine Grant, Eric Martin, Sabina Bucher, Michael Juda, Joseph DePasquale, Joseph Minow, Stephen Murray, Paul Viens, Scott Wolk, Paul Plucinsky, Daniel Schwartz, Stephen O'Dell, William Blackwell, Thomas Aldcroft, Daniel Shropshire, Bradley Spitzbart

Proceedings Volume 6686, 668603 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.734594

KEYWORDS: Charge-coupled devices, Sensors, X-rays, Observatories, Bismuth, Solar processes, Solar radiation models, Solar radiation, Space operations, Back illuminated sensors

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 30 June 2006 Paper

An historical fluence analysis of the radiation environment of the Chandra X-ray Observatory and implications for continued radiation monitoring

P. Plucinsky, J. DePasquale, D. Schwartz

Proceedings Volume 6270, 62701J (2006) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.672233

KEYWORDS: Charge-coupled devices, X-rays, Observatories, Sensors, Databases, Space operations, Environmental monitoring, Solar radiation, Silicon, Helium

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 15 June 2006 Paper

Verifying the low-energy spectral response models of the CXO ACIS and the XMM-Newton EPIC CCDs

Joseph DePasquale, Steven Snowden, Paul Plucinsky

Proceedings Volume 6266, 62662Q (2006) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.671653

KEYWORDS: Charge-coupled devices, Neon, Calibration, Spectral models, Observatories, X-rays, Data modeling, Sensors, Signal to noise ratio, Spectral calibration

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 18 August 2005 Paper

Managing radiation degradation of CCDs on the Chandra X-ray Observatory II

William Blackwell, Brent Williams, Catherine Grant, Daniel Schwartz, Shanil Virani, Daniel Shropshire, Thomas Aldcroft, Stephen O'Dell, Joseph DePasquale, Christine Harbison, Paul Plucinsky, Bradley Spitzbart, Michael Juda, Scott Wolk, Stephen Murray, Kenneth Gage, Kevin Marsh, Robert Cameron, Joseph Minow, Eric Martin, Bradley Bissell, Jon Chappell

Proceedings Volume 5898, 58980R (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.619442

KEYWORDS: Charge-coupled devices, Sensors, X-rays, Solar processes, Observatories, Space operations, Magnetosphere, Bismuth, Solar radiation models, Solar radiation

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 11 October 2004 Paper

An evaluation of a bake-out of the ACIS instrument on the Chandra X-Ray Observatory

Richard Logan, Richard Edgar, Joseph DePasquale, Perry Knollenberg, Beverly LaMarr, Neil Tice, Alexey Vikhlinin, Norbert Schulz, Douglas Swartz, Dan Shropshire, Herman Marshall, Gordon Garmire, Marshall Bautz, Paul Plucinsky, Tan Trinh, Rino Giordano, Catherine Grant, Shanil Virani, Leon McKendrick, Gregory Prigozhin, Steve Kissel, Dan Schwartz, Martin Mach, Stephen O'Dell

Proceedings Volume 5488, (2004) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.552029

KEYWORDS: Charge-coupled devices, Contamination, Collimators, X-rays, Space operations, Observatories, Absorption, Sensors, Thermal modeling, Aerospace engineering

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 29 September 2004 Paper

Verifying the ACIS contamination model with 1E0102.2-7219

Norbert Schulz, Alexey Vikhlinin, Paul Plucinsky, Joseph DePasquale, Richard Edgar, Herman Marshall

Proceedings Volume 5501, (2004) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.552068

KEYWORDS: Contamination, Charge-coupled devices, Absorption, Bismuth, Calibration, Observatories, Spectral models, Data modeling, X-rays, Imaging spectroscopy

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 3 February 2004 Paper

Improving the science observing efficiency of the Chandra X-ray Observatory via the Chandra radiation model

Paul Plucinsky, Robert Cameron, Daniel Schwartz, Shanil Virani, Stephen O'Dell, Joseph Minow, Joseph DePasquale, William Blackwell

Proceedings Volume 5165, (2004) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.505878

KEYWORDS: Data modeling, Observatories, X-rays, Instrument modeling, Magnetosphere, Charge-coupled devices, Satellites, Databases, Magnetism, Solar processes

Read Abstract +

The Chandra X-ray Observatory (CXO), NASA's latest "Great Observatory", was launched on July 23, 1999 and reached its final orbit on August 7, 1999. The CXO is in a highly elliptical orbit, with an apogee altitude of 120,000 km and a perigee altitude 20,000 km, and has a period of approximately 63.5 hours (≈ 2.65 days). It transits the Earth's Van Allen belts once per orbit during which no science observations can be performed due to the high radiation environment. The Chandra X-ray Observatory Center currently uses the National Space Science Data Center's "near Earth" AP-8/AE-8 radiation belt model to predict the start and end times of passage through the radiation belts. Our earlier analysis (Virani et al, 2000) demonstrated that our implementation of the AP-8/AE-8 model (a simple dipole model of the Earth's magnetic field) does not always give sufficiently accurate predictions of the start and end times of transit of the Van Allen belts. This led to a change in our operating procedure whereby we "padded" the start and end times of transit as determined by the AE-8 model by 10 ks so that ACIS, the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer and the primary science instrument on-board Chandra, would not be exposed to the "fringes" of the Van Allen belts on ingress and egress for any given transit. This additional 20 ks per orbit during which Chandra is unable to perform science observations integrates to approximately 3 Ms of "lost" science time per year and therefore reduces the science observing efficiency of the Observatory. To address the need for a higher fidelity radiation model appropriate for the Chandra orbit, the Chandra Radiation Model (CRM) was developed. The CRM is an ion model for the outer magnetosphere and is based on data from the EPIC/ICS instrument on-board the Geotail satellite as well as data from the CEPPAD/IPS instrument on-board the Polar satellite. With the production and implementation of the CRM Version 2.3, we present the results of a study designed to investigate the science observing time that may be recovered by using the CRM for science mission planning purposes. In this paper, we present a scheme using the CRM such that for a modest increase in ACIS CTI, approximately 500 ks can be recovered each year for new science observations.

Proceedings Article | 3 February 2004 Paper

A study of the seasonal variations of the Chandra X-ray Observatory radiation model

Robert Cameron, Daniel Schwartz, Joseph DePasquale, Joseph Minow, Stephen O'Dell, Paul Plucinsky, William Blackwell, Shanil Virani

Proceedings Volume 5165, (2004) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.516469

KEYWORDS: Observatories, Databases, X-rays, Space telescopes, Magnetosphere, Solar processes, Spectrometers, Charge-coupled devices, Telescopes, Data modeling

Read Abstract +

The Chandra X-ray Observatory (CXO), launched in July of 1999, contains two focal-plane imaging detectors and two transmission-grating spectrometers. Maintaining an optimal performance level for the observatory is the job of the Chandra X-ray Center (CXC), located in Cambridge, MA. One very important aspect of the observatory's performance is the science observing efficiency. The single largest factor which reduces the observing efficiency of the observatory is the interruption of observations due to passage through the Earth's radiation belts approximately every 2 2/3 days. During radiation belt passages, observations are suspended on average for over 15 hours and the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) is moved out of the focus of the telescope to minimize damage from low-energy (100-200 keV) protons. The CXC has been using the National Space Science Data Center's "near Earth" AE-8/AP-8 radiation belt model to predict the entry and exit from the radiation belts. However, it was discovered early in the mission that the AE-8/AP-8 model predictions were inadequate for science scheduling purposes and a 10ks "pad time" was introduced on ingress and egress of perigee to ensure protection from radiation damage. This pad time, totaling 20 ks per orbit, has recently been the subject of much analysis to determine if it can be reduced to maximize science observing efficiency. A recent analysis evaluating a possible correlation between the Chandra Radiation Model (CRM) and the Electron Proton Helium Instrument (EPHIN) found a greatest lower bound (GLB) in lieu of a correlation for the ingress and egress of each perigee. The GLB is a limit imposed on the CRM such that when the CRM exceeds this limit on ingress, this defines the new safing time and similarly for egress. We have shown that using this method we can regain a significant amount of lost science time at the expense of minimal radiation exposure. The GLB analysis also found that different GLB's produce varied results and hint that there could be a time dependence associated with the GLB, possibly related to the orientation of the Observatory's orbit. Utilizing CRM V2.3, we present the search for a seasonal dependence on the value of the GLB; we find a seasonal effect that appears to depend on the orientation of Chandra's orbit with respect to the Earth's magnetic field.

Proceedings Article | 11 March 2003 Paper

Flight spectral response of the ACIS instrument

George Chartas, Alexey Vikhlinin, Michael Wise, Glenn Allen, Paul Plucinsky, Joseph DePasquale, Herman Marshall, Divas Sanwal, Marcus Teter, Richard Edgar, Catherine Grant, Shanil Virani, Norbert Schulz, Michael Raley

Proceedings Volume 4851, (2003) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.461473

KEYWORDS: Charge-coupled devices, Calibration, Data modeling, Contamination, Spectral resolution, Absorption, Bismuth, Manganese, X-rays, Sensors

Read Abstract +

We discuss the flight calibration of the spectral response of the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) on-board the Chandra X-ray Observatory (CXO). The spectral resolution and sensitivity of the ACIS instrument have both been evolving over the course of the mission. The spectral resolution of the frontside-illuminated (FI) CCDs changed dramatically in the first month of the mission due to radiation damage. Since that time, the spectral resolution of the FI CCDs and the Backside-illuminated (BI) CCDs have evolved gradually with time. We demonstrate the efficacy of charge-transfer inefficiency (CTI) correction algorithms which recover some of the lost performance. The detection efficiency of the ACIS instrument has been declining throughout the mission, presumably due to a layer of contamination building up on the filter and/or CCDs. We present a characterization of the energy dependence of the excess absorption and demonstrate software which models the time dependence of the absorption from energies of 0.4 keV and up. The spectral redistribution function and the detection efficiency are well-characterized at energies from 1.5 to 8.0~keV primarily due to the existence of strong lines in the ACIS calibration source in that energy range. The calibration at energies below 1.5 keV is challenging because of the lack of strong lines in the calibration source and also because of the inherent non-linear dependence with energy of the CTI and the absorption by the contamination layer. We have been using data from celestial sources with relatively simple spectra to determine the quality of the calibration below 1.5 keV. We have used observations of 1E0102.2-7219 (the brightest supernova remnant in the SMC), PKS2155-304 (a bright blazar), and the pulsar PSR~0656+14 (nearby pulsar with a soft spectrum), since the spectra of these objects have been well-characterized by the gratings on the CXO. The analysis of these observations demonstrate that the CTI correction recovers a significant fraction of the spectral resolution of the FI CCDs and the models of the time-dependent absorption result in consistent measurements of the flux at low energies for data from a BI (S3) CCD.

Proceedings Article | 2 January 2002 Paper

Monitoring the health and safety of the ACIS instrument on board the Chandra X-ray Observatory

Peter Ford, Shanil Virani, Paul Plucinsky, Joseph DePasquale

Proceedings Volume 4844, (2002) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.460672

KEYWORDS: Safety, Observatories, Space operations, X-rays, Charge-coupled devices, Data communications, Sensors, Spectroscopy, Actuators, Analog electronics

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 2 January 2002 Paper

Optimizing the efficiency of command load inspection for the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) on the Chandra X-ray Telescope

Shanil Virani, Joseph DePasquale, Paul Plucinsky

Proceedings Volume 4844, (2002) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.460673

KEYWORDS: Space operations, Observatories, Inspection, Lawrencium, Spectroscopy, X-rays, Safety, Charge-coupled devices, X-ray telescopes, Sensors

Read Abstract +

Showing 5 of 14 publications

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years