How does wide-angle breast tomosynthesis depict calcifications in comparison to digital mammography? A retrospective observer study

Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz; Ruben E. van Engen; Koen Michielsen; Ramona W. Bouwman; Suzan Vreemann; Nico Karssemeijer; Ritse M. Mann; Ioannis Sechopoulos

doi:10.1117/12.2318054

6 July 2018 How does wide-angle breast tomosynthesis depict calcifications in comparison to digital mammography? A retrospective observer study

Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz, Ruben E. van Engen, Koen Michielsen, Ramona W. Bouwman, Suzan Vreemann, Nico Karssemeijer, Ritse M. Mann, Ioannis Sechopoulos

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 10718, 14th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI 2018); 107181T (2018) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2318054
Event: The Fourteenth International Workshop on Breast Imaging, 2018, Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Abstract

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) provides superior breast cancer detection performance compared to digital mammography (DM), but it is unclear whether DBT alone is sufficient to accurately visualize lesions with calcifications, or supplemental DM is needed. In this work, we performed a retrospective observer study to assess and compare the depiction of calcifications on DM, DBT, and synthetic mammography (SM). Eighty views from 40 lesions with calcifications in 39 patients acquired with a wide-angle DBT system were included (two views per case - cranio-caudal and medio-lateral oblique). Four experienced researchers (3, 10, 11, 21 years) in breast imaging scored the images. For each case, the regions-of-interest containing calcifications in DM, DBT and SM were shown simultaneously. The readers ranked (ties allowed) the three modalities for the depiction of calcifications and assessed if more blurring was present in DM or DBT. DM was ranked as the best modality to depict calcification lesions in 84% of the cases, DBT in 22%, and SM in 7% (P<0.001). Similarly, for 86% of the views, DBT had more blurring of the calcifications than DM. In some cases, DBT showed higher contrast of calcifications providing better visualization, but worse characterization due to signal blurring. For cases with subtle calcifications, the higher noise of DBT images deteriorated their visualization. SM was preferred over DBT for large clusters, while it failed in some cases to display any calcifications. In conclusion, our results show the current limitations of DBT and its derived SM to depict calcifications in comparison to DM.

Citation Download Citation

Alejandro Rodriguez-Ruiz, Ruben E. van Engen, Koen Michielsen, Ramona W. Bouwman, Suzan Vreemann, Nico Karssemeijer, Ritse M. Mann, and Ioannis Sechopoulos "How does wide-angle breast tomosynthesis depict calcifications in comparison to digital mammography? A retrospective observer study", Proc. SPIE 10718, 14th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI 2018), 107181T (6 July 2018); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2318054

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
11 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Digital breast tomosynthesis

Breast

Visualization

Digital mammography

Neodymium

Mammography

Reconstruction algorithms

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years