Impact of reflective torque tube on rear side irradiance in bifacial photovoltaic modules

Trevor J. Coathup; Mandy R. Lewis; Annie C. J. Russell; Alejandro Conesa; Javier Guerrero-Perez; Christopher E. Validivia; Karin Hinzer

doi:10.1117/12.2615658

4 March 2022 Impact of reflective torque tube on rear side irradiance in bifacial photovoltaic modules

Trevor J. Coathup, Mandy R. Lewis, Annie C. J. Russell, Alejandro Conesa, Javier Guerrero-Perez, Christopher E. Validivia, Karin Hinzer

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 11996, Physics, Simulation, and Photonic Engineering of Photovoltaic Devices XI; 119960A (2022) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2615658
Event: SPIE OPTO, 2022, San Francisco, California, United States

Abstract

Non-uniform irradiance on the rear side of bifacial photovoltaic (PV) modules causes electrical mismatch between cells and energy loss across the module. Racking structures increase this non-uniformity through shadows and reflections that vary throughout the day. However, commercial software typically use constant values to estimate mismatch losses in annual simulations. We investigate the impact of torque tube shading and reflection on rear side irradiance mismatch in bifacial PV modules in one-in-portrait (1P) and two-in-portrait (2P) horizontal single-axis trackers with a range of ground albedos over a typical meteorological year in Livermore, California, USA. Irradiance simulations use a version of bifacial_radiance, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s python wrapper for the RADIANCE ray tracing software, which we modified for arbitrary 2D irradiance sampling of the module(s) under investigation. For a torque tube reflectivity of 0.745, torque tube reflection accounts for 3.0% and 5.5% of the annual rear insolation in 1P and 2P configurations, respectively, for a 0.2 albedo; or 2.9% and 3.1% for a 0.6 albedo. Torque tube reflection decreases annual rear insolation mismatch from 11.8% to 10.7% in 1P configurations, and from 11.5% to 9.8% in 2P configurations with 0.2 albedo. Similarly, with 0.6 albedo, annual rear insolation mismatch decreases from 12.6% to 11.6% in 1P configurations, and from 11.9% to 10.4% in 2P configurations. However, we demonstrate that annual figures are insufficient for capturing the impact of torque tube reflection; seasonal and diurnal variations must also be considered.

Conference Presentation

Citation Download Citation

Trevor J. Coathup, Mandy R. Lewis, Annie C. J. Russell, Alejandro Conesa, Javier Guerrero-Perez, Christopher E. Validivia, and Karin Hinzer "Impact of reflective torque tube on rear side irradiance in bifacial photovoltaic modules", Proc. SPIE 11996, Physics, Simulation, and Photonic Engineering of Photovoltaic Devices XI, 119960A (4 March 2022); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2615658

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available