|
1.INTRODUCTIONSentinel-4 is an imaging UVN (UV-VIS-NIR) spectrometer which will provide accurate measurements of key atmospheric constituents such as ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, methane, and aerosol properties over Europe and adjacent regions from a geostationary orbit (see Fig. 1) – hence the motto of Sentinel-4 “Knowing what we breathe”. In the family of already flown UVN spectrometers (SCIAMACHY [3, 4], OMI [5,6], GOME & GOME 2 [7]) and of those spectrometers recently launched (TROPOMI) and currently under development (Sentinel-5), Sentinel 4 is unique in being the first geostationary UVN mission, together with very similar geostationary UVN missions over other continents, which are being developed in parallel by NASA (TEMPO) and KARI (GEMS). Furthermore, thanks to its 60-minutes repeat cycle measurements and high spatial resolution (8x8 km2), Sentinel-4 will increase the frequency of cloud-free observations, which is necessary to assess troposphere variability. 1.1Instrument characteristicsThe Sentinel-4/UVN instrument is a hyperspectral spectrometer operating with designated spectral bands in the solar reflectance spectrum. The prime Sentinel-4/UVN parameters are listed in Table 1. Table 1:Sentinel-4/UVN instrument main design and performance parameters [2].
The requirement specifications of S4-UVN are amongst others set for level-0 and for level-1b data at End of Life (EOL) for the full signal dynamic range, for unpolarised spatially uniform scenes with a confidence level of one sigma. The requirement specifications have to be verified, partly on the ground and partly in orbit, during the commissioning phase (phase E1). ESA has implemented a number of requirements to be met before launch to assure a minimum of values to be met as apportionment of the total calibration. Some requirements, such as the instrument polarisation sensitivity, can on the other hand only be verified during an on-ground calibration phase, because the full set of required linearly polarized input light scenarios can only be offered to the instrument on the ground. Figure 2 shows the S4 PFM instrument in its test configuration (at the Airbus OTN test facility prior to shipment to the RAL TVAC facility) 1.2Instrument Characterization and CalibrationAfter completion of the assembly, alignment and environment test phases in the 2020-2021 timeframe, the S4-UVN PFM instrument is ready for the crucial phase of Characterization and Calibration (C&C phase) at the RAL (UK) facility since early summer 2022. A full calibration is being performed on ground under flight representative thermal-vacuum conditions (i.e. thermal-vacuum environment with flight representative conditions for pressure, temperatures for detectors and optical bench). Fig 3 shows the S4-UVN PFM integrated into the TVAC facility in RAL. The aim of the calibration and on-ground characterization activities for the S4-UVN instrument performed during the combined characterization and calibration campaign is twofold: the verification of the performance related customer requirements at L0 and L1b and the provision of measurements needed to derive the calibration keydata. The latter ones are required by the science processor for the L0 to L1b processing [1]. The strategy and rationale to verify the S4-UVN requirements are based on the on ground measurements list specified in the S4-UVN requirement specification. This is a comprehensive list of measurements established by ESA based on past experience from similar missions like SCIAMACHY, OMI, GOME & GOME 2. This list is provided in Table 2. The on-ground measurements list is completed with requirements related to specific characterizations of the instrument such as straylight, Instrument Spectral Response Function (ISRF), absolute radiometry traceability, … Table 2:list of the instrument parameters that shall be calibrated on-ground with sufficient accuracy to meet all requirements on the accuracy of the level 1b data products.
The C&C campaign logic is such that in advance to the calibration phase, directly after the TB/TV phase, a series of Performance Verification measurements (occurring during the so-called debugging phase) are being performed on one hand as instrument and OGSE health check and on the other hand to ensure that the anticipated L0 instrument performances (for instance polarization sensitivity) are as expected. From this point in time the instrument configuration is frozen (i.e. no possible change in configuration anymore unless all acquired Calibration Key Data will have to be measured again) and the start of the calibration with the generation of the corresponding instrument key data is kicked off. This paper describes the performance verification and calibration measurement program, its rationale and presents preliminary results from the S4-UVN PFM C&C campaign. 2.S4-UVN CALIBRATIONThe instrument calibration and level-0 to level-1b data processing can be separated into three main categories: radiometric calibration, spectral calibration and geometric characterisation. The radiometric calibration includes all parameters that play a role for calibrating the instrument signal binary units into radiometrically calibrated radiances (in photons/(s.nm.cm2.sr)) and irradiances (in photons/(s.nm.cm2)). In turn, this includes all optical effects (radiometric throughput, gratings, stray light), detector effects and electronic effects. The radiometric calibration also includes the Earth reflectance calibration via the so-called instrument Bi-directional Scattering Distribution Function (BSDF) that radiometrically calibrates the earth radiances observed in orbit with respect to the on-board diffusers used for sun irradiance observations. The spectral calibration transfers the detector pixel data into wavelengths and calibrates the Instrument Spectral Response Functions that are essential for spectral calibration and for L1b-L2 data processing. The geometric characterisation encompasses amongst others the co-registration, the spatial resolution and the geolocation, which attaches geolocations on the earth to the observed ground samples and provides all required angular information for the illumination conditions that can in turn have an impact on the radiometric calibration; these will include satellite position and pointing, landmarks and preliminary spatial sample classification (e.g. land/water/cloud mask). The following sections are addressing these different aspects separately, with special emphasis of the S4-UVN key calibration measurements: absolute and relative radiometry, straylight, polarisation, detection chain, spectral calibration and instrument spectral response function, Point spread function, integrated energy and co-registration. 2.1Radiometric calibrationThe radiometric calibration includes the calibration of the radiometric goniometries for Earth radiance and sun irradiance measurements prior to launch with an accuracy that is compliant with the in-flight absolute radiometric accuracy requirements of the Earth spectral radiance, on absolute irradiance and absolute Earth reflectance, and the relative viewing angle dependencies thereof. The viewing properties of the instrument (i.e. lines of sight, fields of view, intra-channel co-alignment and inter-channel co-alignment) will be included, as well as the illumination angles of the diffusers, in the calibration prior to launch to accuracies that are compliant to the in-flight accuracy requirements of these viewing properties. The absolute radiometric radiance and irradiance are traceable to primary radiometric standards used during on-ground calibration. The radiometric requirements of S4-UVN are per nature difficult to achieve. For instance the instrument response in Earth observation mode shall be calibrated on the ground to an accuracy better than 1.0% and the instrument response in sun calibration mode shall be calibrated on-ground to an accuracy better than 0.8% (all values apply on a one sigma confidence level). Based on experience from previous similar instrument calibrations, in order to meet such demanding requirements it is required to combine the results of the measurements obtained with different illumination sources (Optical Ground Support Equipment - OGSE) in order to increase the accuracy of the calibration keydata and in order to minimize errors originating from peculiarities associated with each illumination source, such as light flux level, distance to instrument, homogeneity of illumination, generated straylight, representativeness of in-orbit illumination, temporal stability, polarization, absolute radiometric calibration status. Each of these parameters contributes to the overall error for that specific illumination source, and by combining the results from different sources the final errors can be reduced considerably. In order to achieve this target, it is necessary to properly commission the different light sources and perform measurements where the radiometric dependencies on the parameter that is varied are investigated. For this purpose the following set of OGSE is used in combination for the radiometric calibration measurements (see Table 3 and 4). In accordance with this approach the absolute radiometric calibrations and their angular dependencies are calibrated separately. Table 3:OGSE used during Radiometric measurements.
Table 4:Radiometric measurements and their objectives.
The used OGSE are designed to optimally calibrate both the absolute Earth radiance and sun irradiance, as well as calibrate the Earth reflectance via the instrument Bi-directional Scattering Distribution Function (BSDF). The requirements on the instrument BSDF (reflectance) are most stringent, because the earth reflectance is used for most of the L1b-L2 data processing algorithms, and a number of error contributions in radiance and irradiance absolute radiometric calibrations cancel in the instrument BSDF / earth reflectance. Examples of the implemented OGSE measurements configurations are presented in Figure 4. Fig. 5 presents the preliminary results for the ISP measurements during the debugging phase for Abs_Rad_2 (config 3R) and Refl_sphere (config. 3I/3R). Straylight: Spectral stray light, spatial stray light and combinations thereof are being considered. The spectral stray light calibration extends beyond the optical channel boundaries. For the UV-VIS-NIR source wavelengths in the range from 300 to 1100 nm are considered due to the sensitivity of the detectors in this wavelength range. The accuracy of the pre-launch stray light calibration shall be compliant to the pre-launch accuracy requirements of absolute radiance, absolute irradiance and absolute Earth reflectance, as well as to the absolute radiance, irradiance and reflectance radiometric accuracy requirements for the level 1b data in-orbit. Stray light contributions from inside the instrument field of view and from outside the field of view are considered. For internal stray light the effects from near-field stray light (the area where the spectral and spatial response functions go over into stray light) and far-field stray light are considered. Far-field stray light can be separated into uniform stray light (over spectral and/or spatial pixels) and ghost-type stray light (localised at certain groups of spectral or spatial pixels). For the Sentinel-4/UVN instrument stray light is particularly challenging for the wavelength regions below 320 nm and around 760 nm, due to the low Earth radiance signals originating from ozone and O2 A-band, respectively, and for unclouded ground scenes with low albedos (<5%), which may collect significant fractions of spectral spatial stray light from clouded ground scenes observed at the same time on the CCD detectors at other wavelengths and viewing positions. On the other hand, the above areas are also the ones that are most interesting from a data usage perspective for tropospheric ozone and NO2 and cloud and aerosol information from the O2 A-band spectral region, underlining the importance of proper and sufficient stray light reduction in the level-1b data. Different measurement approaches and OGSE use for on-ground calibration and keydata generation for the uniform and ghost straylight correction are considered. The rationale of these various measurements and their implementation is explained below:
Additional measurements types are also envisaged for characterization/verification of straylight following the knowledge obtained during the projects evolution. 5-Reflection (5R) ghost measurements: The 5R ghost in NIR was identified via optical simulation and its presence was confirmed in the frame of the lower level Telescope-Spectrometer-Assembly (TSA) optical test. Three dedicated straylight measurements are planned to fully characterize it:
Out of field straylight characterization measurements: although the out of field straylight is not planned to be corrected the following measurements for characterization are planned.
Near slit straylight feature measurements: a characterization of the near slit straylight features is foreseen to measure the illumination dependence of the features observed in the vicinity of the instrument slit (See fig 6)
In addition to these measurements that are mandatory based on the current status of analysis and instrument testing, there are a few measurements additionally planned for straylight characterisation and end to end performance verification:
Detection chain: A complete on-ground calibration of detector properties and electronic properties will be performed. The parameters that are of relevance for the Sentinel-4/UVN instrument are listed in Table 2. Detector exposure smear will be calibrated for non-homogeneous illumination of the spectrometer’s entrance slit. Polarization The instrument’s polarization sensitivity is required to be less than 1% at level-0, also because the 0-1b data processing doesn’t foresee radiometric correction steps for polarization. In the instrument design this is realized using a weak polarization scrambler and transmission optics, in combination with small incidence angles for the geostationary mission. The focus of the dedicated on-ground polarization measurements will be to show compliance to this requirement and characterize remaining polarization spectral features. Spectral features originating in the instrument, e.g. from the on-board diffusers as observed in predecessors missions, as well as the above mentioned remaining polarization spectral features, may hamper the analysis of atmospheric trace gases in the L1b-L2 data processing. These features have as much as possible to be eliminated by the instrument design since correction of the polarization spectral features based on an unknown polarization state of the Earth light is not possible with the Sentinel-4 UVN design. The relative spectral radiometric accuracy (peak-to-peak) are considering small spectral window widths of a couple of nanometers, which for compliance of the requirement incorporate these spectral features next to other relevant errors for the instrument response in sun irradiance and Earth radiance observation modes, as well as for Earth reflectance (ratio radiance over irradiance). As example, in the UVVIS between 315 and 500 nm, the maximum relative radiometric spectral accuracy error over a spectral window width of 3 nm is required to be smaller than 0.05%. In order to characterize the PFM polarization (sensitivity and polarization spectral features), two types of measurements are implemented with the Polarization (POL) OGSE:
2.2Spectral calibrationOn-ground Spectral calibration will be performed with dedicated spectral calibration sources and in flight with the knowledge of the solar Fraunhofer lines and the atmospheric absorption lines. The spectral calibration will also be checked for its dependence to non-homogeneous illumination of the instrument’s entrance slit (in east-west scan direction): inhomogeneously illuminating the instrument entrance slits will introduce a shape change of the spectral response function, which may in turn introduce an apparent spectral shift of the observed spectral absorption lines in the spectra. In addition, the spectral response function (spectral slit function) of the instrument will be calibrated on the ground. The spectral response functions are used to establish the spectral resolution and for the spectral calibration algorithms in the level-0 to level-1b data processing, as well as for the level-1b to level-2 data retrievals. Most of the level-1b to level-2 data retrievals convolve high-resolution absorption cross section spectra of the atmospheric constituents with the spectral response functions, that have been calibrated accurately prior to launch. The convolved spectra are then compared and fitted to the measured spectra in order to retrieve the atmospheric constituent concentrations. The instrument spectral response functions (ISRF) are thus essential for the accuracy of the level-1b to level-2 data processing and the accuracy of the level-2 data products. For accurate calibration of the spectral response functions a tuneable monochromatic light sources such as a wavelength-tuneable laser can be used. The spectral calibration comprises the following measurements:
Fig 8 present a first overview of the ISRF measurements for homogeneous scene and for the radiance port.
2.3Geometric calibrationThe orientation of the instrument’s 3-axis reference frame with respect to the spacecraft’s 3-axis reference frame will be calibrated prior to launch, as this is required for the latitude/longitude geolocation of the observed scenes. This will allow calibrating the relevant instrument geometrical parameters (lines of sight, pixel fields of view, angles on the onboard diffusers) with respect to the instrument alignment cube. The translation to the spacecraft reference frame will then be made via the above relative orientation calibration between the spacecraft and instrument reference frames. The geometric calibration and characterization includes the derivation of the system’s PSF. Furthermore, besides the intraband co-registration characterization for performance verification purposes (within UVVIS band and within NIR band) the optimized setting of the S4-UVN co-registration offset compensator will be determined and optimized for the UVVIS-NIR interband coregistration. The co-registration offset compensator is a thermally driven method to shift the image on the NIR detector in the N/S direction within one N/S pixel range in order to align its offset with respect to the one of the image on the UVVIS detector. This is one of the first measurements during the on ground campaign in order to perform all other calibration and characterization measurements with this optimized setting. Additionally, the relative Pixel Line Of Sight (PLOS) map will be measured. This is the angular distance both, the E/W and N/S center positions between two arbitrary detector pixels. These center position(s) (could be more than one, depending on the polarization scrambler performance) will additionally determine the relative line of sight (LOS) calibrations per detector pixel, as well as the co-registration between the various detector pixels, because the measurements will be performed with white light illumination in parallel beams. The width will also determine the spatial resolution and the width and the shape combined will be essential inputs to the integrated energy assessment. The measurement is similar to the star measurements. One or more point sources are scanned across the instrument’s slit in E/W direction. This scanning is performed on ground in a step and stare fashion. A similar sequence is then performed with the point sources centered in the slit and scanned in N/S direction with sub-pixel steps. This measurement sequence will be performed with an unpolarized OGSE white light beam. Even though the polarization scrambler is expected to result in different PSF measurement parameters depending on the input polarization direction, it is assumed that this will not play an important role for the level 0 to 1b and 1-2 data processing or for the performance of the instrument. 3.CONCLUSIONThis paper provides an overview of the requirements for the Sentinel-4/UVN instrument embarked on the geostationary Meteosat Third Generation Satellites, with special emphasis on the on-ground calibration requirements. The demanding instrument performance verification and calibration requirements and measurements, due to the high temporal and high spatial resolution, to continuously monitor the earth’s atmosphere above Europe and northern Africa, are discussed. Furthermore, this paper is presenting the key measurements objectives as well as implementation of the S4-UVN PFM Calibration and Characterization campaign. At the time this paper is written the first block of measurements (debugging including the instrument polarization characterization) is completed and the spectral measurements (ISRF in uniform and non-uniform scene) are on-going. REFERENCESAhlers, B., Bazalgette Courrèges-Lacoste, G. Guldimann, B., Stark, H., Dobber, M.,
“GMES Sentinel-4/UVN instrument concept and calibration approach,”
in 20th CALCON Technical Conference,
Google Scholar
Riedl, S., Harlande, M., Schlosser, C., Kolm, M., Maurer, R., Bazalgette Courrèges-Lacoste, G., Pachot, C., Ahlers, B., Grabarnik, S., Gambicorti, L., Sallusti. M., Bulsa, G., Bagnasco, G., M.,
“Sentinel-4 UVN - A Geostationary Imaging UVN Spectrometer for Air Quality Monitoring - Performance, Measurement Modes and Model Philosophy,”
in Conference: International Conference on Space Optics - ICSO,
(2018). Google Scholar
Ahlers, B. et al.,
“In-orbit detection of spectral features in SCIAMACHY,”
in Proc. SPIE,
401
(2004). Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, G. et al.,
“SCIAMACHY Level 1 data: calibration concept and in-flight calibration,”
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6 5347
–5367
(2006). https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5347-2006 Google Scholar
Dobber, M.R. et al.,
“Ozone monitoring instrument calibration,”
IEEE Trans. Geo. Rem. Sens., 44
(5), 1209
–1238
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.869987 Google Scholar
Dobber, M.R. et al.,
“EOS-Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument in-flight performance and calibration,”
in SPIE Proceedings, Optics and Photonics,
(2006). Google Scholar
Callies, J., Corpaccioli, E., Eisinger, M., Hahne, A.,Lefebvre, A.,
“GOME-2 – Metop’s Second-Generation Sensor for Operational Ozone Monitoring,”
ESA bulletin, 102
(2000). Google Scholar
Kim, Jhoon et al.,
“New Era of Air Quality Monitoring from Space: Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS),”
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 101
(1),
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0013.1 Google Scholar
|