Presentation + Paper
3 April 2024 Breast density assessment via deep learning: head-to-head model comparisons in full-field digital mammograms and synthetic mammograms
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
To enhance reproducibility and robustness in mammographic density assessment, various deep learning models have been proposed to automatically classify mammographic images into BI-RADS density categories. Our study aims to compare the performances of different deep learning models in making breast density classifications from full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus synthetic mammography (SM), the newer 2D mammographic image format acquired with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). We retrospectively analyzed negative (BI-RADS 1 or 2) routine mammographic screening exams (Selenia or Selenia Dimensions; Hologic) acquired at sites within the Barnes-Jewish/Christian (BJC) Healthcare network in St. Louis, MO from 2015 to 2018. BI-RADS breast density assessments of radiologists were obtained from BJC’s mammography reporting software (Magview 7.1). For each mammographic imaging modality, a balanced dataset of 4,000 women was selected so there were equal numbers of women in each of the four BI-RADS density categories, and each woman had at least one mediolateral oblique (MLO) and one craniocaudal (CC) view per breast in that mammographic imaging modality. Previously validated pre-processing steps were applied to all FFDM and SM images to standardize image orientation and intensity. Images were then split into training, validation, and test sets at ratios of 80%, 10%, and 10%, respectively, while maintaining the distribution of breast density categories and ensuring that all images of the same woman appear only in one set. ResNet-50 and EfficientNet-B0 architectures were optimized, trained, and evaluated separately for different imaging modalities. Overall, the models had comparable performance, though ResNet-50 performed slightly better in most cases. Furthermore, FFDM images had better classification accuracies than SM images. Our preliminary findings suggest that further deep learning developments and optimizations may be needed as we develop breast density deep learning models for the newer mammographic imaging modality, DBT.
Conference Presentation
(2024) Published by SPIE. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Krisha Anant, Juanita Hernandez Lopez, Sneha Das Gupta, Debbie L. Bennett, and Aimilia Gastounioti "Breast density assessment via deep learning: head-to-head model comparisons in full-field digital mammograms and synthetic mammograms", Proc. SPIE 12927, Medical Imaging 2024: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, 129270C (3 April 2024); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3008648
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Breast density

Mammography

Deep learning

Digital breast tomosynthesis

Education and training

Digital mammography

Breast

Back to Top