Paper
1 November 1993 Restoration of Faint Object Camera (FOC) imaging data: considerations when choosing FOC point spread functions (PSFs)
David A. Baxter, Perry E. Greenfield, Warren Hack, Anatonella Nota, Robert Ian Jedrzejewski, Francesco Paresce
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We present a discussion of the various sources of FOC Point Spread Functions (PSFs), and the problems associated with their use. In particular, we highlight the time variability of the PSF halo structure and indicate some of the causes. We examine the usefulness of the PSF modelling software, TinyTim, and show that although this software creates visually similar images, these similarities are to a large extent superficial. We conclude by showing that the theoretical PSFs produced by TinyTim are inadequate for the restoration of high S/N FOC point source images. We also conclude that, because of 'breathing', there is a strong likelihood that empirical PSFs, whether pre-existing or specifically obtained, may not be sufficient either.
© (1993) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
David A. Baxter, Perry E. Greenfield, Warren Hack, Anatonella Nota, Robert Ian Jedrzejewski, and Francesco Paresce "Restoration of Faint Object Camera (FOC) imaging data: considerations when choosing FOC point spread functions (PSFs)", Proc. SPIE 1945, Space Astronomical Telescopes and Instruments II, (1 November 1993); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.158776
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Point spread functions

Optical fiber cables

Mirrors

Image restoration

Space telescopes

Ultraviolet radiation

Telescopes

Back to Top