Paper
29 October 1993 Comparison of Bayesian and Dempster-Shafer theory for sensing: a practitioner's approach
James C. Hoffman, Robin R. Murphy
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
This paper presents an applied practical comparison of Bayesian and Dempster-Shafer techniques useful for managing uncertainty in sensing. Three formulations of the same example are presented: a Bayesian, a naive Dempster-Shafer, and a Dempster-Shafer approach using a refined frame of discernment. Both the Bayesian and Dempster-Shafer (with a refined frame of discernment) yield similar results; however, information content and representations are different between the two methods. Bayesian theory requires a more explicit formulation of conditioning and the prior probabilities of events. Dempster-Shafer theory embeds conditioning information into its belief function and does not rely on prior knowledge, making it appropriate for situations where it is difficult to either collect or posit such probabilities, or isolate their contribution.
© (1993) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
James C. Hoffman and Robin R. Murphy "Comparison of Bayesian and Dempster-Shafer theory for sensing: a practitioner's approach", Proc. SPIE 2032, Neural and Stochastic Methods in Image and Signal Processing II, (29 October 1993); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.162045
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 27 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Probability theory

Sensors

Ultrasonics

Calculus

Visualization

Chemical elements

Information theory

RELATED CONTENT

Sensor fusion for the detection of land mines
Proceedings of SPIE (October 15 1999)
Depth fusion for antipersonnel landmine detection
Proceedings of SPIE (October 18 2001)
A performance metric for belief fusion techniques
Proceedings of SPIE (March 28 2005)

Back to Top