Paper
26 June 2001 Maximum-likelihood and maximum-a-posteriori estimates of human-observer templates
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Procedures for direct estimation of observer templates (also known as classification images) have largely focused on unbiased estimates. In this paper we take a different approach, deriving maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum a posteriori (MAP) procedures for estimating an observer template from the outcome of a two-alternative forced-choice experiment. While these estimation procedures will generally result in estimates with some bias, the reduction in variance can potentially outweigh the negative effects of a small bias. One promising feature of the ML and MAP estimates is that the distribution of the sample images used for the experiment is not necessary for evaluating the likelihood term implying that the method is robust to the distribution of images (although the validity of the assumptions used to derive these estimators may not be). It may therefore be possible to use these methods to estimate classification images for detection tasks in realistic images.
© (2001) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Craig K. Abbey and Miguel P. Eckstein "Maximum-likelihood and maximum-a-posteriori estimates of human-observer templates", Proc. SPIE 4324, Medical Imaging 2001: Image Perception and Performance, (26 June 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.431179
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 11 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Signal detection

Signal to noise ratio

Error analysis

Statistical analysis

Image classification

Interference (communication)

Biological research

Back to Top