EUV mask image placement management in writing, registration, and exposure tools

Eric Cotte; Uwe Dersch; Christian Holfeld; Uwe Mickan; Holger Seitz; Thomas Leutbecher; Gunter Hess

doi:10.1117/12.617484

28 June 2005 EUV mask image placement management in writing, registration, and exposure tools

Eric Cotte, Uwe Dersch, Christian Holfeld, Uwe Mickan, Holger Seitz, Thomas Leutbecher, Gunter Hess

Proceedings Volume 5853, Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology XII; (2005) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.617484
Event: Photomask and Next Generation Lithography Mask Technology XII, 2005, Yokohama, Japan

Abstract

Due to the non-telecentricity of the EUV illumination, the EUV mask flatness budget dictates the use of an electrostatic chuck in the exposure tool. Since the mask backside flattening provided by the electrostatic chuck in the exposure tool is very different from the 3-point mounts currently employed to hold reticles in pattern generation and registration measurement tools, this raises the question of which mounting techniques to apply in future patterning and registration tools. In case drastic changes need to be made to the tool configurations, it is important to know, and as early as possible, whether backside chucking of reticles, via an electrostatic or vacuum chuck, is absolutely required or if a 3-point mounting scheme can suffice in these tools. Using finite element simulations, the effects on EUV mask image placement of stressed layers and their patterning, as well as substrate and chuck non-flatness were predicted for these different conditions. The results can be used to calculate image placement error budgets and determine what substrate and blank specifications are needed for the implementation of EUV at the 32-nm node.

Citation Download Citation

Eric Cotte, Uwe Dersch, Christian Holfeld, Uwe Mickan, Holger Seitz, Thomas Leutbecher, and Gunter Hess "EUV mask image placement management in writing, registration, and exposure tools", Proc. SPIE 5853, Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology XII, (28 June 2005); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.617484

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available