Paper
28 March 2007 Modeling and testing of a non-standard scanning device with dose reduction potential
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
A non-standard scanning device with dose-reduction potential was proposed at the SPIE Medical Imaging conference 2006. The new device obtains the Radon data after the X-ray beam is collimated through a special mask. This mask is combined with a new geometry that permits an efficient data collection, thus the device has the potential of reducing the dose by a factor of two. In this work, we report a prototype of the new device and experimental data acquisition using only the mask of the new scanning geometry. In order to obtain the optimal parameters for the scanning device, several factors have been considered, including detector elements and shielding shape, fan beam angle, speed of the source rotation and materials employed. The calibration of the detector elements needs especial attention, due to the dependence of the detector response on the energy of the X-rays. A simplfied version of the device was designed and mounted. Phantom data were acquired using this prototype and were used to test the performance of the new design. The results obtained are highly promising, even though the prototype developed does not make use yet of all the potential features proposed in the theory.
© (2007) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Hugo de las Heras, Oleg Tischenko, Werner Panzer, Yuan Xu, and Christoph Hoeschen "Modeling and testing of a non-standard scanning device with dose reduction potential", Proc. SPIE 6510, Medical Imaging 2007: Physics of Medical Imaging, 65103R (28 March 2007); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.705803
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 3 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Sensors

Calibration

Prototyping

Data acquisition

Fluctuations and noise

Lead

Medical imaging

Back to Top