Paper
8 May 2009 Range test validation cloud tracking system
Bogdan R. Cosofret, Shing Chang, Aram Faghfouri, Michael L. Finson, Christopher M. Gittins, Tracy E. Janov, Ian M. Konen, Daisei Konno, William J. Marinelli, Mark J. Levreault, Rex K. Miyashiro, James O. Jensen
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
The Range Test Validation System (RTVS) includes a constellation of five AIRIS-WAD standoff multispectral sensors oriented around a 1000×1000 meter truth box at a range of 2700 meters. Column density data derived from these sensors is transmitted in real-time to a command post using a wireless network. The data is used with computed tomographic methods to produce 3-D cloud concentration profiles for chemical clouds traversing the box. These concentration profiles are used to provide referee capability for the evaluation of both point and standoff sensors under test. The system has been used to monitor chemical agent simulants released explosively as well as continuously through specialized stacks. The system has been demonstrated to accurately map chemical clouds with concentrations as low as 0.5 mg/m3 at spatial and temporal resolutions of 6 meters and 3 seconds.1 Data products include geo-referenced cloud mass centroids and boundaries as well as total cloud mass.
© (2009) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Bogdan R. Cosofret, Shing Chang, Aram Faghfouri, Michael L. Finson, Christopher M. Gittins, Tracy E. Janov, Ian M. Konen, Daisei Konno, William J. Marinelli, Mark J. Levreault, Rex K. Miyashiro, and James O. Jensen "Range test validation cloud tracking system", Proc. SPIE 7304, Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives (CBRNE) Sensing X, 73040I (8 May 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.816648
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Clouds

Sensors

Control systems

Tomography

Reconstruction algorithms

Computed tomography

Error analysis

Back to Top