Paper
28 April 2009 Comparison of interpretability of 1080p30 and 720p60 motion imagery: trade-offs in resolution and frame rate
Charles Fenimore, John Roberts, Hassan Sahibzada, James Yen
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We have conducted an evaluation comparing the interpretability potential of two standardized HD video formats, 1080p30 and 720p60. Despite the lack of an existing motion imagery (MI) quality scale akin to the NIIRS scale, we have exploited previous work on MI scale development in measuring critical imagery parameters affecting interpretability. We developed a collection of MI clips that covers a wide parameter range. These well-characterized clips provide the basis for relating perceived imagery interpretability to MI parameters, including resolution (related to ground sample distance, GSD) and frame rate, and to target parameters such as motion and scene complexity. This report presents key findings about the impact of resolution and frame rate on interpretability. Neither format is uniformly preferred, but the analysis quantifies the interpretability difference between the formats and finds there are significant effects of target motion and target size on the format preferences of the imagery analysts. The findings have implications for sensor system design, systems architecture, and mission planning.
© (2009) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Charles Fenimore, John Roberts, Hassan Sahibzada, and James Yen "Comparison of interpretability of 1080p30 and 720p60 motion imagery: trade-offs in resolution and frame rate", Proc. SPIE 7307, Airborne Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance (ISR) Systems and Applications VI, 73070H (28 April 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.818909
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Motion measurement

Image resolution

Motion analysis

Statistical analysis

Data modeling

Error analysis

Image analysis

Back to Top