1.INTRODUCTIONReady availability of powerful software has brought about a metamorphosis of the field of optical system analysis and design, one of the core areas of optical engineering. Practicing scientists or technologists are no longer constrained by their limited computational ability; rather they can give vent to their imagination and carry out experiments with intensive numerical procedures in pursuance of practical problems in analysis and synthesis of complex optical and photonic systems. Indeed, someone with good understanding of the principles of image formation and image quality assessment procedures, photometry, radiometry, basics of aberration theory and characteristics of different types of lens systems, optical and photonic components, sources and detectors can do wonders with many of the software. Unfortunately, many scientific and/or technical people or their managers seem to have a short sighted perception that procuring powerful optics design software is sufficient for tackling practical problems of analysis and synthesis of optical systems with rudimentary knowledge of optics. This notion has gained ground, because even a novice often comes out with makeshift solutions for routine or known problems by using the software. Unless proper attention is given for assessment of quality of the solution so obtained, the suboptimal nature of the makeshift solution will be realized neither by the inexperienced designer, nor by the unwary user of the design. This is one of the major drawbacks of self-learning mode for optical design, particularly so in the beginning. On the other hand, there is a burgeoning requirement for novel optical and photonic systems catering to needs of diverse fields from defense, aerospace, astronomy and health sciences, to name a few. Emulating routine systems is often inadequate to tackle such problems. Gone are the days when only suitably trained professionals used to carry out optical system analysis and design. Very few centers of learning are now conducting degree level courses that impart lessons on optical system analysis and design. The shortfall in the supply of trained designers is being increasingly met up by physicists and engineers from diverse backgrounds. The latter are being compelled to take up the unenviable task with little support from their colleagues and seniors. They are on the lookout for sources that can provide answers to their queries. On a different note, scientists working in different frontline areas are increasingly making use of optics and photonics in pursuance of their objectives, and often in the process they have to carry out novel experimental setups. It is obvious that proper conceptualization and correct implementation of the experiments call for understanding of characteristics and behavior of the optical and photonic components and devices to be used and of the optical system being developed and used in course of the experiment. Lack of this understanding is often a big hurdle. Some of the problems mentioned above have been highlighted recently with suggestions for remedial actions 1-6 SPIE, OSA and few other societies are also providing short duration tutorials by experts during their conferences as continuing education programs. With this backdrop in view, a set of ten lecture units or modules dealing with foundations of optical system analysis and design (FOSAD) has been developed. Primary emphasis is given for treatment of imaging optical systems. In a regular optical engineering course, this is covered in two semesters with accompanying tutorials. For special purposes, the whole course can be squeezed into twenty lecture hours, with two lecture hours assigned for each of the ten modules, accompanied by tutorials. This course has so far been delivered in Poland, Japan and India, and it is being modified by feedbacks from participants. 2.GOALS OF FOSADThe goals of the course on FOSAD are: (i) To impart basic knowledge of ray and wave optics for understanding behavior of optical systems (ii) To emphasize the varying levels of approximation, and their needs for handling the seemingly intractable (in rigorous mathematical sense) problem of optical system design (iii) To underscore the role of various types of symmetry in (a) axial imaging, (b) extra-axial imaging, (c) development of aberration theory, and (d) structure of lenses (iv) To reiterate the role of pupils in analysis and synthesis of optical systems (v) To dispel commonly prevalent myths and misconceptions in instrumental optics (vi) To demystify ‘Automatic Lens Optimization’ (vii) To reduce the role of empiricism and heuristics in practical lens design (viii) To provide adequate references for seeking answers to queries not properly addressed in the course (ix) To bridge the gap between ‘examination optics’ and ‘real optics’ [- a goal set forth by late A. E. Conrady7 about a century back] (x) To highlight the great contributions of pioneers and stalwarts in the field [many of these contributions are currently getting into oblivion, but are likely to infuse lateral thinking in curious onlookers]
3.STRUCTURE OF THE MODULES OF FOSAD3.1Module I General IntroductionDifferent types of optical systems used in astronomy, biology, industry, defense, entertainment etc. Optical and photonic components and devices used in the systems Specifications for systems, components and devices Demonstration of different lens types Ray layouts for representative systems upholding the unity of functions in the apparent diversity ICO definition of “Optics” Theories of Light used in analytical treatment of optical systems Interrelationship between the theories; What? Where? When? Characteristics of a propagating plane light wave: polarization, amplitude, direction, frequency and phase Concept of Wavefront and Rays as orthogonal trajectories Statement of the problem of lens design/optical system design General Methodology for Optical Design
3.2Module II Paraxial TreatmentRaison d’être of paraxial analysis Paraxial Approximation: on-axis imaging and extra-axial imaging Paraxial Ray Tracing Formulae Choice of paraxial ray variables General Object-Image relationship for an axi-symmetric imaging system Finite focal and afocal systems Principal planes and Nodal planes; concept of equivalent focal length Conjugate positions for afocal systems; types of afocal systems Throw-Magnification Curve Telephoto and Wide angle Lenses
3.3Module III Further Topics in Paraxial OpticsImportance of paraxial invariant Stops and Pupils Vignetting Telecentric systems Definition of F-number and numerical aperture Role of Pupil Matching for Optical systems in tandem Field Lens and Relay Lens Medical Endoscopes: A Case study Classification of lens systems based on field size and relative aperture size Types of telescopes Magnification by simple magnifiers; magnifiers and eyepiece Compound Microscopes; Infinity corrected objectives Illumination Systems: Netsonian critical illumination and Köhler illumination Eyepieces; optical parameters of the human eye Monocular, Binocular and Biocular Viewing
3.4Module IV Foundations of Aberration TheoryFermat’s principle and Malus-Dupin Theorem Introduction to Hamiltonian Optics Optical Path Differential Theorem Hamilton-Bruns Point Eikonal; Point Angle Eikonal; Angle Eikonal Perfect Imaging with Real rays Stigmatic Imaging of a point by Cartesian ovals Aplanatic Surfaces Optical Cosine Rule; Abbe sine condition; Herschel condition Optics around a principal ray Parabasal Optics; s and t rays Lagrangian Optics
3.5Module V Monochromatic and Chromatic AberrationsImage Formation by real rays in a general optical system without symmetry Image Formation by real rays in an axi-symmetric lens system Symmetry considerations in performance analysis: Axial symmetry and Bilateral symmetry Measures of Aberrations Ray Aberration, Wave Aberration and Hamilton-Bruns’ eikonal : Interrelationships Effects of shift of center and radius of the reference sphere Power series expansion of the aberration function Longitudinal Shift of focus and Transverse Shift of focus Aberrations of Various orders Point imaging Aberrations and Aberrations of image shape Classification of Aberrations Chromatic Aberrations Axial Chromatism and Lateral Chromatism Secondary Spectrum Conrady (D-d) formula
3.6Module VI Primary AberrationsPhysical significance of primary aberrations Primary Aberrations for a specific field point Primary Aberrations and Seidel Aberrations Seidel Aberrations in terms of paraxial parameters of the paraxial marginal ray and the paraxial pupil ray (Expressions only; No derivation) Summation of primary aberrations for cascaded interfaces Ray diagrams corresponding to different primary aberrations Aberration free lenses and surfaces Thin Lens Aberration Theory Seidel Aberrations of a thin lens in air with stop on it Dependence on Shape and Conjugate variables Dependence on refractive index and dispersion of the optical material of the lens Stop Shift formulae Pupil Aberrations Conjugate Shift formulae
3.7Module VII Diffraction Theory of Image FormationRaison d’être for Diffraction Theory Airy Pattern Two point resolution; Rayleigh criterion; Sparrow Criterion Point Spread Function (PSF) for Aberrated systems Rayleigh quarter wavelength rule Strehl criterion (Definitionshelligkeit) Special case for small aberrations Variance of Wave Aberration Maréchal criterion for aberration balancing Strehl criterion for large aberrations Zernike Aberration polynomials
3.8Module VIII System Theoretic Viewpoints in Optical Image FormationPrinciple of Superposition Space invariance and isoplanatism Fourier Analysis Physical interpretation of the kernel of Fourier Transform Optical Transfer Function (OTF): Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and Phase Transfer Function (PTF) Edge Spread Function (ESF) Interrelationship between PSF, OTF and ESF Coherence and Incoherence Abbe Theory of coherent image formation Imaging as a process of double diffraction Hopkins’ aberration tolerance criterion based on OTF Through focus MTF
3.9Module IX Lens Design OptimizationMathematical preliminaries for optimization of univariate and multivariate functions Degrees of freedom in lens design optimization Boundary constraints based on physical realizability, manufacturability and material availability Concept of Merit Function as a metric during optimization process Nonlinear Optimization methods Formation of Merit Function in terms of aberrations and pseudo-aberrations Method of least squares optimization Damped least squares and techniques for damping Local optimization and Global optimization Heuristic methods for global/quasi-global optimization Stochastic global optimization methods A prophylactic approach for global synthesis
3.10Module X Miscellaneous Topics(a) Conventional lens types for infinite conjugate systems (b) Aberration Reduction strategies in lens design (c) Advanced Topics in Extra-axial imagery: Paraxial and Real pupils; Pupil exploration; Anamorphic imagery and its effects on OTF analysis; Effects of residual aberrations on Cosine-fourth power law of illumination (d) Advanced topics in Chromatism: Spherochromatism; Effects of Pupil chromatism; Image space associated rays and Object space associated rays; Polychromatic PSF and MTF (e) Elements of Zoom Lenses
4.CONCLUDING REMARKSThe course on FOSAD presupposes that the audience has A-Level knowledge of optics, three dimensional geometry and multivariate calculus; an exposure to Fourier analysis is an added advantage. Also the course is supposed to play a complementary role in making effective use of any worthwhile optical analysis and design software to which the participant has access. Topics like ray tracing, derivation of Seidel aberrations and computation of finite ray aberrations are not covered, for these details do not enhance understanding the behavior of optical and photonic systems. A set of questions accompany each module; these are covered in the tutorials. Feedback is sought from each participant for tailoring of course content and orientation. REFERENCESKidger, M.J.,
“The Importance of Aberration Theory in Understanding Lens Design,”
in Proc. SPIE,
26
–32
(1997). Google Scholar
O’Shea, D. C.,
“A survey of Lens Design Courses,”
in Proc. SPIE,
75
–81
(1997). Google Scholar
Sasian, J. M.,
“Trends in Teaching Lens Design,”
in Proc. SPIE,
56
–58
(2002). Google Scholar
Bentley, J. L.,
“Thirty different views of a lens design solution space: a good example for teaching students how to design and not to design a lens,”
in Proc. SPIE,
58750C-1
–58750C-8
(2005). Google Scholar
Doushkina, V. V. and Silberman, D. M.,
in Proc. SPIE,
66680E-1
–66680E-13
(2007). Google Scholar
Conrady, A.E., Applied Optics and Optical Design, Part I, Oxford, London
(1929). Google Scholar
|
