Experimental characterization, comparison and image quality assessment of two ultrasound contrast agents: Optison and Definity

Amy C. Hughes; Steven W. Day; Cristian A. Linte; Karl Q. Schwarz

doi:10.1117/12.2217741

1 April 2016 Experimental characterization, comparison and image quality assessment of two ultrasound contrast agents: Optison and Definity

Amy C. Hughes, Steven W. Day, Cristian A. Linte, Karl Q. Schwarz

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 9790, Medical Imaging 2016: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography; 97900H (2016) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2217741
Event: SPIE Medical Imaging, 2016, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

Microbubble-based contrast agents are commonly used in ultrasound imaging to help differentiate the blood pool from the endocardial wall. It is essential to use an agent which produces high image intensity relative to the surrounding tissue, commonly referred to contrast effect. When exposed to ultrasound waves, microbubbles produce an intense backscatter signal in addition to the contrast produced by the fluctuating size of the microbubbles. However, over time, the microbubble concentration depletes, leading to reduced visual enhancement. The retention time associated with contrast effect varies according to the frequency and power level of the ultrasound wave, as well as the contrast agent used. The primary objective of this study was to investigate and identify the most appropriate image acquisition parameters that render optimal contrast effect for two intravenous contrast agents, Optison™ and Definity™. Several controlled in vitro experiments were conducted using an experimental apparatus that featured a perfused tissue-emulating phantom. A continuous flow of contrast agent was imaged using ultrasound at different frequencies and power levels, while a pulse wave Doppler device was used to monitor the concentration of the contrast agent solution. The contrast effect was determined based on the image intensity inside the flow pipe mimicking the blood-pool relative to the intensity of the surrounding phantom material mimicking cardiac tissue. To identify the combination of parameters that yielded optimal visualization for each contrast agent tested, the contrast effect was assessed at different microbubble concentrations and different ultrasound imaging frequencies and transmission power levels.

Citation Download Citation

Amy C. Hughes, Steven W. Day, Cristian A. Linte, and Karl Q. Schwarz "Experimental characterization, comparison and image quality assessment of two ultrasound contrast agents: Optison and Definity", Proc. SPIE 9790, Medical Imaging 2016: Ultrasonic Imaging and Tomography, 97900H (1 April 2016); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2217741

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
6 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Ultrasonography

Tissues

Doppler effect

Blood

Backscatter

Image quality

Visualization

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years