|
1.IntroductionPhotoacoustic imaging (PAI) is a hybrid imaging modality that combines optical excitation with ultrasound detection.1 Compared to pure optical imaging such as confocal2,3 and two photon microscopy,3,4 PAI is less limited by optical diffusion for deep tissue imaging, taking advantage of both ballistic and diffused photons. In PAI, the deposited photon energy (scattered or not) is converted to acoustic waves, which are scattered much less than photons in biological tissues, and thus PAI can penetrate deeper while maintaining acoustically determined spatial resolutions.1,5 Moreover, different from ultrasound imaging, the signals in PAI originate from optical absorption rather than acoustic back reflection, providing inherent sensitivity to tissue’s functional status and molecular composition,6 with various endogenous and exogenous contrast agents. Among different implementations of PAI, photoacoustic computed tomography (PACT)7–12 is the most promising for clinical translation, due to its deep penetration and high compatibility with commercial ultrasound imaging systems. In PACT, the laser pulses are usually directed to the tissue surface by using a multimode optical guide, which is often bifurcated to flank the transducer array and forms a dark-field optical illumination pattern on the tissue surface.1,13 Yet due to the strong attenuation of photons (e.g., effective attenuation coefficient of human breast tissue is at 730 nm14), it remains a great challenge for PAT to penetrate beyond a few centimeters. The largest penetration in PAT reported so far is about 11 cm in chicken breast tissue using highly absorbing exogenous contrast agents.1,15 In many clinical situations, the region of interest can be deeply seated underneath the skin surface but relatively close to some body cavities. For example, the prostate can be more than 10 cm from the abdominal surface but is only 2 to 3 cm from the nearby rectal cavity. Therefore, it is possible to image the deep-seated organs by delivering light from inside through the body cavities. Thus, some internal-illumination PAI designs have emerged to tackle the penetration issue by embedding an optical fiber in the tissue and delivering light adjacent to the region of interest. The applications so far include identification of nerves,16,17 ex vivo human placenta imaging,18 and in vivo mouse brain imaging.19 In these systems, the photoacoustic waves are detected from the outside, and minimally invasive or noninvasive procedures are performed by exploiting body cavities such as the esophagus, the nasal cavity, and the rectum.17,18,20–22 However, the previous internal illumination designs rely on light radiating either from the bare fiber tip or from a small slot on the side of the fiber jacket, which cannot homogeneously illuminate the surrounding tissue. In addition, none of the aforementioned designs have been validated for imaging targets in vivo at depths of more than 5 cm.21 In this study, we aim to achieve a larger photoacoustic imaging depth by employing a different internal illumination scheme. Compared with previous designs, the tip of the optical fiber used in our study was fused to a needle-shaped silica diffuser, which enables uniform illumination of a large tissue volume. Both tissue phantom and in vivo experiments were performed on deep targets using internal illumination, and the results were compared with those using external illumination. Our results have demonstrated that the new internal illumination with a fiber diffuser can improve the imaging depth of PACT. 2.MethodsThe PACT system is based on a commercial ultrasound scanner (Vantage 128, Verasonics, Washington) with a linear array transducer (L7-4, 128 elements, 5 MHz central frequency, 60% bandwidth) [Fig. 1(a)]. Laser pulses (pulsewidth: 8 ns; Q-smart 850, Quantel Laser, Montana) are delivered through a customized multimode fiber (Pioneer Optics, Connecticut) with a numerical aperture (NA) of 0.43 and a core diameter of 1.5 mm [Fig. 1(b)]. The distal end of the optical fiber is fused with a 3-cm-long active diffuser made of silica (diameter: 1.5 mm). The entire diffuser is sealed by a transparent quartz cap with a diameter of 2.4 mm. The function of the glass cap is twofold: (1) it protects the diffuser from contacting the tissue surface and thus avoids the fiber damage due to the “hot spots” stained by blood; (2) it traps air around the diffuser surface so that the light can propagate inside the entire diffuser due to the large refractive index mismatch between silica () and air (1.0), and gradually leak out along the diffuser to provide uniform cylindrical illumination pattern. Without the quartz cap, the diffuser surface can get in touch with the tissue or the body liquid, which has a similar refractive index () with the silica. In this case, photons would leak out of the diffuser quickly without providing a cylindrical-shaped illumination pattern. Finally, two-dimensional PA data are acquired using the ultrasound scanner, and the offline image reconstruction is based on a traditional delay and sum method after correcting the transducer’s receiving directivity. We first investigated the illumination pattern of the fiber diffuser at both 532 and 1064 nm. The fiber was inserted into an agarose (Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri) phantom mixed with 0.5% (v/v) intralipid to mimic the tissue scattering (Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri). The reduced scattering coefficient of the phantom was at 532 nm.23,24 A CMOS camera was used to capture the illumination at both wavelengths. Then, we performed phantom experiments to characterize the PACT system with internal illumination. For the spatial resolution, a human hair with a diameter of was used as a line source. The spatial resolutions were quantified by calculating the full-width-at-half-maximum values of the hair signal along the axial and lateral directions in the image plane. To determine the penetration depth, we imaged a plastic tube (diameter: 2 mm) filled with whole bovine blood. We overlaid an agarose phantom (thickness: ) mixed with 0.5% (v/v) fat milk (reduced scattering coefficient: at 750 nm25) above the hair or the tube. Another agarose phantom of the same composition (thickness: 15 to 50 mm) was put beneath the target and above the fiber diffuser. Thickness of the bottom phantom was varied to alter the distance between the illumination source and the target. The imaging depth here is limited mostly by the light attenuation from the fiber diffuser to the target. Deep imaging with internal illumination was demonstrated by performing both phantom and in vivo experiments. In the phantom experiment, a 7.5-cm-thick agarose phantom mixed with 0.5% intralipid was placed above a red leaf skeleton to mimic blood vasculature. The fiber diffuser was placed beneath the leaf with a 1-cm-thick scattering phantom in between. The ultrasound transducer was mounted above the phantom with the image plane aligned with the fiber diffuser. Three-dimensional (3-D) data sets were acquired by translating the transducer via a stepper motor stage (VT-80, Micos Inc.), with a step size. To compare the penetration depth with external illumination, a fiber bundle (Model number 54-203, Edmund Optics Inc., New Jersey) was mounted on the ultrasound transducer via a 3-D-printed adapter to illuminate phantom from the top. In vivo experiments were conducted on a female Swiss Webster mouse (10 weeks old and 31.5 g in weight). The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Duke University. The hair on the mouse’s back and abdomen was removed. To mimic the future application of internal illumination on large animals, we overlaid 37-mm-thick chicken breast tissue on top of the mouse’s back. On top of the chicken tissue was a water tank that coupled the ultrasound transducer. Ultrasound gel was used to couple the tissue surface and the water tank bottom. The fiber diffuser was placed beneath the mouse abdomen. Laser pulses at 1064 nm (pulse energy: ) were delivered to the diffuser. The ultrasound transducer’s image plane was near the mouse heart. A similar procedure was implemented using external illumination with the same output pulse energy, and the result was compared with that using internal illumination. To further demonstrate the penetration depth of the fiber diffuser, chicken breast tissue ( thick) was placed between the mouse abdomen and the fiber diffuser. Another 55-mm-thick chicken breast tissue was put between the mouse back and the ultrasound transducer. The same optical energy was applied to the mouse at 1064 nm. A total number of 300 frames of PA images were acquired and averaged to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). 3.Results and DiscussionThe illumination pattern of the fiber diffuser was investigated with both 532 and 1064 nm light. The entire agar phantom was uniformly illuminated as shown in Figs. 1(c) and 1(d), showing the homogeneity of light distribution at both wavelengths. The homogeneous illumination is critical for imaging a relatively large volume without adjusting the fiber position to point directly at the targets. The PACT’s resolutions were measured at an depth. This depth is likely to be clinically relevant in the future (e.g., transrectal imaging of prostate cancers). The measured axial resolution is and the measured lateral resolution is [Figs. 2(a)–2(c)]. The measured resolutions are slightly worse than the theoretical values, mainly because the acoustic attenuation over the 80 mm distance between the target and the ultrasound transducer reduced the high frequency components of the PA signals and the effective NA of the beam forming. The penetration depth was measured at 1064 nm with various target-to-fiber distances from 15 to 45 mm [Fig. 2(d)]. The SNR as a function of depth is shown in Fig. 2(e). The SNR decreased as the target moved away from the diffuser, with a decay rate of . These results have demonstrated that the internal illumination can provide an imaging depth of at least 45 mm from the internal fiber diffuser and 80 mm from the external ultrasound transducer. A red leaf was imaged at a depth of in the agar-intralipid phantom [Figs. 3(a)–3(c)]. The PA signals were acquired with both the internal illumination and external illumination. Three-hundred B-scans along the elevational direction were reconstructed, and the maximum amplitude projection (MAP) images along the axial direction were extracted. With the internal illumination, the leaf can be clearly imaged, as shown in Fig. 3(d). The PA image agrees well with the true leaf structure. By contrast, no PA signals were detected from the same area with the external illumination [Fig. 3(e)], mainly because most photons were attenuated within the first a few centimeters in the phantom. In contrast, with the internal illumination, photons did not have to travel a long distance to reach the target, and the effective penetration depth was improved. Figures 3(f) and 3(g) show the ultrasound and photoacoustic B-scan images of the leaf, which agree well with each other. To further demonstrate the deep imaging capability, in vivo studies were performed on a mouse overlaid with 37 mm chicken breast tissue. B-mode ultrasound imaging together with PACT with internal illumination were performed, as shown in Fig. 4(a). The B-mode ultrasound imaging [Fig. 4(b) and Video 1] clearly shows the mouse overlaid with chicken breast tissue, and the tissue displacement caused by the breathing and heart beating was observed. While no PA signals were detectable with external illumination [Fig. 4(c)], the PA signals at 47 mm deep were detected with internal illumination with an SNR of [Fig. 4(d) and Video 2]. Figure 4(e) further shows the penetration depth with internal illumination enabled by the fiber diffuser. Blood vessels in the mouse abdomen, which are 1.5 cm away from the fiber diffuser and 6.5 cm from the transducer, can be imaged with an SNR of . To compare the image quality, we have shown the single-laser-shot image in Fig. 5(a) and the 300-times-averaged image in Fig. 5(b). 4.ConclusionIn this letter, we present a new PACT scheme that illuminates the targets from inside with a fiber diffuser. Compared with the traditional external illumination, the internal illumination shows superior performance in imaging deep-seated targets in both phantom and in vivo studies. Compared with other interventional PACT methods using internal light illumination, our cylindrical fiber diffuser can potentially irradiate a larger volume of tissue and provide a more homogeneous illumination. Therefore, we believe that the internal illumination method can be useful for imaging internal organs that are deeply seated in the human body but close to the body cavity nearby, including the prostate close to the rectal cavity, the bladder, and kidney close to the urethra and ureter, and the lung close to the trachea. The imaging depth is less limited by the strong optical attenuation from the skin surface. However, the ultimate penetration depth is still limited by the optical attenuation from the fiber diffuser to the target of interest. Several steps will be taken to further improve the image quality. The light energy delivered to the target is limited by the damage threshold of the fiber (peak power: 23.6 MW). A fiber diffuser with a larger core will be customized to deliver more energy and provide homogeneous illumination to a larger volume of tissue. Alternatively, there are cases in which it is not necessary to illuminate all the tissues around the fiber tip, so a fiber diffuser that can direct the light toward a particular direction may be utilized to improve the SNR. For example, a semicylindrical fiber tip with the flat surface coated with silver can reflect light only through the curved surface. With the optimized fiber diffuser, we expect the internal illumination PACT to find well-matched applications in clinical practice, especially for cancer screening and intraoperative guidance. AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by Duke MEDx fund (to J. Yao). We thank Professors Kathy Nightingale and Gregg Trahey for their generous support of the Verasonics System, Ron Hille from Pioneer Optics Company for providing the fiber diffuser, and Emelina Vienneau for editing the manuscript. ReferencesL. V. Wang and S. Hu,
“Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs,”
Science, 335
(6075), 1458
–1462
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216210 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar
M. Rajadhyaksha et al.,
“In-vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin—melanin provides strong contrast,”
J. Invest. Dermatol., 104
(6), 946
–952
(1995). https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12606215 JIDEAE 0022-202X Google Scholar
E. Kahn et al.,
“Fluorescence excitation analysis by two-photon confocal laser scanning microscopy: a new method to identify fluorescent nanoparticles on histological tissue sections,”
Int. J. Nanomed., 7 5545
–5554
(2012). https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S33875 Google Scholar
W. Denk, J. H. Strickler and W. W. Webb,
“Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy,”
Science, 248
(4951), 73
–76
(1990). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2321027 Google Scholar
L. V. Wang,
“Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography,”
Nat. Photonics, 3
(9), 503
–509
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.157 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar
J. Yao and L. V. Wang,
“Sensitivity of photoacoustic microscopy,”
Photoacoustics, 2
(2), 87
–101
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2014.04.002 Google Scholar
R. A. Kruger et al.,
“Thermoacoustic computed tomography using a conventional linear transducer array,”
Med. Phys., 30
(5), 856
–860
(2003). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1565340 MPHYA6 0094-2405 Google Scholar
L. G. Montilla et al.,
“Real-time photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging: a simple solution for clinical ultrasound systems with linear arrays,”
Phys. Med. Biol., 58
(1), N1
–N12
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/1/N1 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar
B. Yin et al.,
“Fast photoacoustic imaging system based on 320-element linear transducer array,”
Phys. Med. Biol., 49
(7), 1339
–1346
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/7/019 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar
H. Zafar et al.,
“Linear-array-based photoacoustic imaging of human microcirculation with a range of high frequency transducer probes,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 20
(5), 051021
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.5.051021 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
A. Buehler et al.,
“Video rate optoacoustic tomography of mouse kidney perfusion,”
Opt. Lett., 35
(14), 2475
–2477
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.002475 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
J. Xia et al.,
“Enhancement of photoacoustic tomography by ultrasonic computed tomography based on optical excitation of elements of a full-ring transducer array,”
Opt. Lett., 38
(16), 3140
–3143
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.003140 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
C. Kim et al.,
“Handheld array-based photoacoustic probe for guiding needle biopsy of sentinel lymph nodes,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 15
(4), 046010
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3469829 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
V. G. Peters et al.,
“Optical properties of normal and diseased human breast tissues in the visible and near infrared,”
Phys. Med. Biol., 35
(9), 1317
–1334
(1990). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/35/9/010 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar
Y. Zhou et al.,
“A phosphorus phthalocyanine formulation with intense absorbance at 1000 nm for deep optical imaging,”
Theranostics, 6
(5), 688
–697
(2016). https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.14555 Google Scholar
W. F. Xia et al.,
“Interventional multispectral photoacoustic imaging with a clinical linear array ultrasound probe for guiding nerve blocks,”
Proc. SPIE, 9708 97080C
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2209047 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar
J. M. Mari et al.,
“Interventional multispectral photoacoustic imaging with a clinical ultrasound probe for discriminating nerves and tendons: an ex vivo pilot study,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 20
(11), 110503
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.11.110503 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
W. Xia et al.,
“Performance characteristics of an interventional multispectral photoacoustic imaging system for guiding minimally invasive procedures,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 20
(8), 086005
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.8.086005 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
L. Lin et al.,
“In vivo deep brain imaging of rats using oral-cavity illuminated photoacoustic computed tomography,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 20
(1), 016019
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.1.016019 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
P. Kruizinga et al.,
“Photoacoustic imaging of carotid artery atherosclerosis,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 19
(11), 110504
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.11.110504 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
D. Piras et al.,
“Photoacoustic needle: minimally invasive guidance to biopsy,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 18
(7), 070502
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.7.070502 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
M. A. Lediju Bell et al.,
“Transurethral light delivery for prostate photoacoustic imaging,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 20
(3), 036002
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.20.3.036002 JBOPFO 1083-3668 Google Scholar
H. Assadi, R. Karshafian and A. Douplik,
“Optical scattering properties of intralipid phantom in presence of encapsulated microbubbles,”
Int. J. Photoenergy, 2014 1
–9
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/471764 Google Scholar
V. N. D. Le et al.,
“Measurements of extrinsic fluorescence in intralipid and polystyrene microspheres,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 5
(8), 2726
–2735
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.002726 BOEICL 2156-7085 Google Scholar
J. W. Qin and R. F. Lu,
“Measurement of the absorption and scattering properties of turbid liquid foods using hyperspectral imaging,”
Appl. Spectrosc., 61
(4), 388
–396
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1366/000370207780466190 APSPA4 0003-7028 Google Scholar
|