Mr. Ethan Tu Profile

Ethan Tu

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (2)

Proceedings Article | 15 February 2021 Presentation + Paper

Machine learned approach for estimating myocardial blood flow from dynamic CT and coronary artery disease risk factors

Ethan Tu, Muneeza Azmat, Kelley Branch, Adam Alessio

Proceedings Volume 11600, 116001I (2021) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2581703

KEYWORDS: Solid modeling, Positron emission tomography, Blood circulation, Arteries, Machine learning, Data modeling, Principal component analysis, Ischemia, Factor analysis, Signal attenuation

Read Abstract +

Proceedings Article | 15 February 2021 Presentation + Paper

Machine learned versus analytical models for estimation of fractional flow reserve from CT-derived information

Muneeza Azmat, Ethan Tu, Kelley Branch, Adam Alessio

Proceedings Volume 11600, 116000W (2021) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2581701

KEYWORDS: Data modeling, Statistical analysis, Machine learning, Blood circulation, Process modeling, General packet radio service, Error analysis, Arteries, Transducers, Performance modeling

Read Abstract +

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is a widely used metric to quantify the functional significance of stenoses in coronary arteries. FFR is the ratio of pressure before and after a stenosis and is measured using a transducer during coronary catheterization. To avoid unnecessary catheterization, many analytical and data-driven models based on non-invasive imaging have been proposed for FFR estimation. In this study, we construct physics-informed analytical models and datadriven machine learning models for FFR estimation based on CT-derived information. All four models require simple information about suspect stenoses, offering rapid, practical approaches for functional assessment. The four models we study are: (1) a patient-specific blood flow informed pressure drop model based on Navier-Stokes equations, (2) a purely geometric model based on stenosis area reduction, (3) a Gaussian process regression model trained on patient specific stenosis geometry and blood flow data, and (4) a Gaussian process regression model trained only on patient specific stenosis geometry. The models were developed and tested using a simulation study with ground truth FFR values from computational fluid dynamics analysis of blood flow through a population of stenosed arteries. In total, 60 different stenosis conditions based on known prevalence were simulated with a range of measurement errors leading to 10000 data sets. The RMSE of the model estimates for approach 1 through 4 are, 0.19, 0.45, 0.06, 0.14. The flow informed machine learning model leads to ~1% lower bias and ~12% lower variance than the flow informed analytical model. Considering the improved variance performance, the machine learning models likely outperform analytic expressions because they learn optimal regression associations robust to noise. This work suggests that machine learned approaches may be superior to conventional analytic expressions for FFR estimation, particularly when inputs contain realistic measurement error.

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years